Big Three
In differential topology, the concept of a regular value is the primary tool used to ensure that the preimage of a set is a well-behaved manifold.
The Definition
Let be a smooth map between manifolds of dimensions and , respectively.
1. Critical Points A point is called a critical point of if the derivative (or differential): is not surjective (i.e., the rank of the linear map is less than the dimension of the target manifold ).
2. Regular Points A point is a regular point if is surjective. This means the derivative map “hits” every direction in the target tangent space.
3. Regular Values A point is called a regular value of if every in the preimage is a regular point.
Important Note: If the preimage is empty, is vacuously considered a regular value.
The Preimage Theorem
If is a regular value of a smooth map , then the subset is a submanifold of with:
example
To determine if is a regular value of the map , we must follow the definition: check the derivative at every point in the preimage .
1. Identify the Preimage
First, we look at all points such that : The preimage is the unit sphere in .
2. Compute the Derivative
The map goes from . Its derivative at any point is represented by the gradient (a linear map from ):
3. Test for Surjectivity
For to be a regular value, the linear map must be surjective for every point in the preimage.
- Since the target space is , “surjective” simply means the linear map is not the zero map ().
- The only point in all of where the derivative is the zero map is the origin .
4. Check the Preimage Points
Is the origin in our preimage ?
- .
- The origin is not on the sphere.
Since the origin is the only critical point of the function, and it does not lie on the sphere, the derivative is surjective at every point on the sphere. Thus, is a regular value.
Comparison: When is a value NOT regular?
If we chose the value , the preimage would be:
Why these are the “Big Three” for Milnor
- Inverse Function Theorem: Milnor uses this to define local coordinates. It ensures that if the derivative is non-singular, the manifold “looks like” Euclidean space locally.
- Implicit Function Theorem: This is used to prove that the preimage of a regular value is a submanifold. For example, if , the regular value gives us the sphere.
- Change of Variables: This is the heart of Integration on Manifolds. It proves that the integral of a differential form doesn’t depend on which coordinate chart (like stereographic projection) you choose.
Notation
That is an astute observation regarding Spivak’s specific pedagogical choices. In Calculus on Manifolds, Michael Spivak is very deliberate about how he bridges the gap between elementary calculus and modern differential geometry.
The short answer is: Spivak uses as a shorthand for the total derivative (the linear transformation), whereas or is more common in the “modern” manifold language used by Milnor and G&P.
Here is the breakdown of why he chooses that notation and how it relates to the other books.
1. The “Calculus” Heritage
Spivak titled the book Calculus on Manifolds because he wanted to generalize the you learned in high school.
- In 1D calculus, is a number.
- In Spivak’s multivariable world, is the unique linear transformation that best approximates near .
- By keeping the “prime” notation, he emphasizes that this is exactly the same concept as the derivative of a single-variable function, just upgraded to higher dimensions.
2. vs. vs.
In the mathematical community, there is a “notation war” for the derivative. Here is how they compare:
|
Spivak |
Emphasizes the derivative as a single object (a linear map). |
|
Analysis/G&P |
Often used to emphasize the “Differential Operator” acting on . |
|
Milnor / Geometry |
Emphasizes the Differential Form or the map between Tangent Spaces (). |
|
Applied Math |
The Jacobian matrix (the numerical representation of the linear map). |
3. The Geometric Shift in Milnor
When you move from Spivak to Milnor, you will see the notation shift to .
- Spivak stays in , so he doesn’t need to worry about which “space” the derivative lives in; it’s always .
- Milnor is working on manifolds and . He uses because he is thinking of the derivative as a push-forward—it takes a vector in the tangent space of the starting manifold and “pushes” it into the tangent space of the target manifold.
Summary: How to read them
When you are reading the “Big Three” theorems in Spivak:
- Every time you see , read it as “The linear transformation that is the derivative.”
- When you go back to Milnor, and he writes , realize he is talking about the exact
Statements of the “Big Three” Theorems in Spivak
Here are the statements as they appear in the text (specifically Chapters 2 and 3).
1. Inverse Function Theorem
Found in: Chapter 2
Theorem 2-11: Suppose that is a continuously differentiable function in an open set containing , and . Then there is an open set containing and an open set containing such that has a continuous inverse which is differentiable and for all satisfies
2. Implicit Function Theorem
Found in: Chapter 2
Spivak presents this as a consequence of the Inverse Function Theorem, often using the following notation for a function :
Theorem 2-12: Let be continuously differentiable in an open set containing and suppose . Let be the matrix . If , then there is an open set containing and an open set containing , and a unique function such that for all . The function is differentiable.
Found in: Chapter 3
This is the most technically demanding statement in the book, involving the absolute value of the determinant of the Jacobian.
Theorem 3-13: Let be an open set and a continuously differentiable function such that for all . If is integrable, then